The supreme court needs to put limits on Trump’s use of the pardoning power | Steven Greenhouse
Summary
Since returning to office, President Trump has issued over 1,800 pardons to various people, including those involved in January 6 events and financial crimes. Some experts and observers say this use of the pardoning power raises concerns about ethics and democracy and suggest the Supreme Court should consider limits on it.Key Facts
- President Trump has issued more than 1,800 pardons since taking office again.
- Many pardons have gone to people convicted of crimes like tax fraud, drug trafficking, and involvement in the January 6 Capitol attack.
- The January 6 pardons include 1,500 people charged or convicted of trying to stop the peaceful transfer of power to President Joe Biden.
- Trump pardoned individuals shortly after their convictions or sentences, sparing them from prison and fines.
- Some pardons involved people connected to Trump or his family’s business interests.
- The U.S. Constitution allows presidents to issue pardons, but it does not clearly set limits on this power.
- Some argue the Supreme Court should impose limits to protect democracy and prevent conflicts of interest.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.
