Chemistry on trial: How a professor tried to convince a court she didn’t kill her husband
Summary
Mamta Pathak, a former chemistry professor in India, tried to defend herself in court against charges of murdering her husband by electrocution. Despite presenting a detailed scientific argument, the court upheld her life sentence based on circumstantial evidence. Pathak claimed the autopsy did not conclusively prove electrocution and raised questions about the investigation's thoroughness.Key Facts
- Mamta Pathak was sentenced to life in prison for murdering her husband, Neeraj Pathak, in April 2021.
- She argued in court using complex chemistry and forensic details, but the court did not accept her defense.
- Pathak claimed it is hard to tell the difference between thermal and electric burn marks without detailed chemical analysis.
- The autopsy concluded Neeraj Pathak died from electrocution; however, Mamta challenged this finding.
- Evidence against her included seized electric wires, sleeping pills, and CCTV footage from their home.
- Mamta also mentioned her husband's health issues like high blood pressure and heart disease as potential causes of death.
- She criticized the investigation for lacking qualified electrical and forensic experts at the crime scene.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.
