AI ‘art’ is boring, soulless theft – and when I see it as an artist I see red | Jess Harwood
Summary
The article shares an artist's strong feelings against AI-generated art, saying it lacks soul and originality. The writer values art made by human effort and worries AI art misses the personal connection and creative struggle behind true art.Key Facts
- The author attended a concert by Split Enz and appreciated the real human experience in their music.
- The artist sees AI-created art as boring, lifeless, and harmful to the environment due to energy use.
- Some art festivals, like Perth Comics Arts festival, refuse to promote or include AI-generated art.
- The author was invited to train AI to imitate their style but declined, feeling it would remove meaning from their work.
- Real art comes from the artist’s creative process and personal struggle, which AI cannot replicate.
- Audiences are interested not only in art but also in the human story and effort behind it.
- Questions about who owns AI “art” (machine, user, or creator of AI) remain unresolved.
- The article reflects on ancient humans creating art and how art expresses human life and presence.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.