Supreme Court turns away Alan Dershowitz's defamation case against CNN
Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court decided not to hear Alan Dershowitz's defamation case against CNN. Dershowitz claimed CNN misrepresented his remarks made during President Trump’s 2020 impeachment trial, but lower courts ruled in favor of CNN citing legal protections for the media when reporting on public figures.Key Facts
- Alan Dershowitz sued CNN for $300 million, saying they defamed him during coverage of President Trump’s first impeachment trial.
- Dershowitz was part of President Trump’s legal defense team and commented on the constitutional rules for impeachment.
- CNN criticized Dershowitz’s statements but also aired his full remarks after he defended them on their network.
- A federal court in Florida ruled CNN did not act with "actual malice," a legal standard requiring proof the media knowingly published false information or recklessly ignored the truth.
- The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld this decision, agreeing CNN's comments were fair and not malicious.
- Dershowitz appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan ruling makes it almost impossible for public figures to win defamation cases.
- The Supreme Court declined to review the case, leaving the lower court rulings in place.
- Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch disagreed with the decision and dissented, but the majority kept the existing legal standard.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.