Account

The Actual News

Just the Facts, from multiple news sources.

Amy Coney Barrett on How Supreme Court Should Think About Free Speech

Amy Coney Barrett on How Supreme Court Should Think About Free Speech

Summary

Justice Amy Coney Barrett discussed how the Supreme Court should interpret free speech, focusing on the idea of "original public meaning." She highlighted that the Constitution is the guiding law, rather than trying to interpret what historical figures like James Madison would think about modern issues, such as social media. Barrett also promoted civility among Supreme Court justices.

Key Facts

  • Amy Coney Barrett explained her approach called "originalism," focusing on the original public meaning of the Constitution.
  • She stated that James Madison's thoughts are not the law; the Constitution itself is the law.
  • Barrett referenced a Supreme Court case involving Snapchat to illustrate challenges in applying originalism to modern issues.
  • She was speaking at an event at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.
  • Barrett has written a book called "Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution."
  • She emphasized the importance of civility among justices, even during debates.
  • The new Supreme Court term begins on October 6.

Source Information