Summary
Prince Harry lost his court appeal against the UK government's decision to remove his police protection. He has limited options to challenge this decision further, as the court ruled that he misunderstood how royal security arrangements work. Harry argued the state should consider the risks associated with his royal status, but the courts did not agree.
Key Facts
- Prince Harry lost his appeal to keep police protection after stepping back from royal duties.
- The Court of Appeal in London ruled against Harry, stating he misunderstood the security arrangements.
- Prince Harry has a deadline to seek a last possible appeal to the Supreme Court.
- The Royal and VIP Executive Committee (Ravec) manages security for key public figures, including royals.
- Ravec was created after security concerns arose in 2003.
- Ravec assesses risks like terrorism and assigns security to protect key individuals.
- The Home Office oversees Ravec's work and funds it through the home secretary.
- Prince Harry argued that his birth position makes him a high-risk individual needing state protection.
