Attorney says there's "no evidence" Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids
Summary
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer argued in court that there is no solid evidence showing she killed her children. He asked the judge to rule her not guilty because the prosecutors did not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.Key Facts
- Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington, made a motion asking the judge to find Clancy not guilty.
- The motion claims the evidence at trial was not strong enough for a jury to convict her beyond a reasonable doubt.
- Prosecutors have not clearly said if they will have a new trial.
- Reddington argued there was no direct proof or admission from Clancy that she killed her kids.
- His current argument was different from earlier statements where he suggested Clancy accepted responsibility.
- Reddington had previously tried to split the trial into two parts: one for guilt and another for mental state, but this was denied.
- Prosecutors disagreed and said there is a lot of evidence showing Clancy killed her children.
- Reddington said his argument is not new and focuses on the prosecution’s failure to prove probable cause.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.
