Attorney says there's "no evidence" Lindsay Clancy admitted killing her kids
Summary
Lindsay Clancy's lawyer argued in court that there is no proof she killed her children, asking the judge to declare her not guilty because the evidence is not strong enough. This argument is a new approach compared to what the lawyer said before and during the trial.Key Facts
- Lindsay Clancy's lawyer, Kevin Reddington, asked the judge to find her not guilty due to lack of strong evidence.
- Prosecutors have not said if they will try Clancy again in court.
- Reddington said there is no evidence, such as an admission from Clancy, showing she killed her children.
- Earlier, Reddington suggested Clancy accepted responsibility for what happened.
- Reddington had previously offered to write that Clancy admits to the killings but now argues prosecutors can't prove it.
- Prosecutors disagreed and said there is a lot of evidence pointing to her guilt.
- Legal experts find this sudden change in defense strategy unusual.
- The court will have another hearing on November 2.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.
