Police accept Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor search warrants were unlawful, court hears
Also reported by Guardian World
Summary
Thames Valley Police admitted that the search warrants used to look through Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's homes were not lawful. The police took documents and electronic devices during the searches, but their reasons for getting the warrants were incorrect. Andrew denies any wrongdoing and his lawyers are challenging the warrants in court.Key Facts
- Thames Valley Police searched Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s homes in Sandringham and Windsor.
- The police now say the search warrants they used were unlawful.
- Andrew was arrested in February for suspicion of misconduct in public office but denies any wrongdoing.
- The warrants were issued before his arrest, and his lawyers question if they were legally valid.
- The police took documents and devices during the searches.
- The warrants required a good reason to seize documents related to business or confidential roles, but the judge who approved them could not be sure of this.
- The case is ongoing with a court review of the police and court actions.
- The investigation partly started after the U.S. Department of Justice released documents involving Andrew’s actions as a trade envoy in 2010.
Read the Full Article
This is a fact-based summary from The Actual News. Click below to read the complete story directly from the original source.