Account

The Actual News

Just the Facts, from multiple news sources.

Opinion: 'Free speech doesn't work just when you agree with it'

Opinion: 'Free speech doesn't work just when you agree with it'

Summary

The article discusses a 1977 legal case where a neo-Nazi group's request to march in Skokie, Illinois, sparked a debate about free speech rights under the First Amendment. The U.S. courts ruled in favor of the group's right to free speech, even though the march did not occur in Skokie. The case is remembered for addressing whether free speech protections include offensive or hateful speech.

Key Facts

  • In 1977, a neo-Nazi group wanted to march in Skokie, Illinois, which has many Jewish residents.
  • The village denied the permit, leading to a national legal debate on free speech.
  • The U.S. courts decided the planned demonstration was protected by the First Amendment.
  • Skokie's arguments included the emotional harm to Holocaust survivors from the swastika imagery.
  • The march eventually moved to Chicago instead of Skokie.
  • David Goldberger, a Jewish attorney for the ACLU, argued for the group's right to free speech.
  • The case highlighted the complexity of protecting free speech, even if the content is offensive.

Source Information