Summary
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected Laura Loomer's attempt to revive her lawsuit against Meta and X, which she claimed violated civil racketeering laws by banning her during her congressional campaigns. Loomer, known for her activism and influence within the MAGA movement, stated she will continue advocating for free speech and against social media censorship.
Key Facts
- Laura Loomer's lawsuit against Meta and X was dismissed by the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Loomer claimed the social media companies violated civil racketeering laws by banning her when she ran for Congress.
- Her suit alleged these bans hurt her ability to compete in elections in Florida in 2020 and 2022.
- Previous courts, including a federal court in California and the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, had already ruled against her.
- Section 230 of a law provides social media companies with legal protection for moderating content.
- Loomer has been a prominent voice in the MAGA movement and has influenced some decisions in the White House.
- She expressed her continued commitment to fighting for free speech on social media.
- Loomer was originally banned from X (formerly Twitter) and Facebook for violating content policies.
