Summary
The article discusses criticisms of policies and rhetoric attributed to Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, highlighting a speech at Quantico where the focus was on aggressive military action. It argues that this approach contrasts with the diverse and disciplined ethos of the U.S. military, which values inclusion and strategic thinking. The piece warns that strategies based on force and exclusion could weaken the military.
Key Facts
- A speech at Quantico emphasized aggressive military action described as "kill people and break things."
- Critics argue this approach contradicts the U.S. military's values of discipline and teamwork.
- The military's strength comes from its diversity, with many members being women, people of color, and immigrants.
- Excluding diverse groups from the military is seen as weakening its readiness and cohesion.
- Historical examples show that exclusionary military practices can harm a nation.
- Modern military challenges include space warfare and cyber defense, requiring strategic thinking.
- The article suggests that U.S. power relies on principled leadership and alliances.
