Summary
The Supreme Court ruled to keep a program that helps provide internet and phone services to remote and underserved areas in the U.S. in place. The court decided 6-3 in favor of the program, stating that it does not violate the Constitution, despite challenges from conservative groups.
Key Facts
- The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to support a program providing subsidized internet and phone services.
- This program supports rural healthcare providers, schools, libraries, and low-income individuals.
- The program is managed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
- The decision ensures that rural and underserved communities continue to have internet and telecommunications access.
- Conservative groups argued that the FCC was collecting taxes, which only Congress can do.
- The Universal Service Fund was created under the 1996 Communications Act to support telecom services in rural areas.
- The FCC collects payments from telecom companies to support the fund, amounting to $8 billion.
- Justices Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas disagreed with the majority decision.
