Summary
New data confirms that cycling is still one of the most energy-efficient ways to travel. Walking requires more energy compared to cycling on flat surfaces at leisure speeds. Both walking and cycling offer health benefits, but cycling provides speed and intensity while walking is easy to include in daily routines.
Key Facts
- Cycling remains a highly energy-efficient way for people to move.
- Walking requires more energy than cycling at leisurely speeds on flat surfaces.
- Cycling allows for covering more ground and can vary in intensity.
- Walking is easily accessible and can fit into everyday life without special equipment.
- Cycling can be costly and finding safe routes might be challenging.
- Walking takes more time to achieve significant cardiovascular benefits.
