The Actual News

Just the Facts, from multiple news sources.

US News

Latest developments and key stories from across the United States

Trump news at a glance: rare rebuke for president as four House Republicans side with Democrats to pass war powers resolution

Trump news at a glance: rare rebuke for president as four House Republicans side with Democrats to pass war powers resolution

Summary

The US House of Representatives voted 215 to 208 to pass a war powers resolution that would require President Donald Trump to get Congress’s approval before continuing military actions in Iran or to withdraw US forces. Four House Republicans joined Democrats to pass this measure, which now moves to the Senate for consideration.

Key Facts

  • The House vote on the war powers resolution was 215 in favor and 208 against.
  • Four Republicans (Thomas Massie, Brian Fitzpatrick, Warren Davidson, Tom Barrett) sided with Democrats to pass the resolution.
  • The resolution aims to limit President Trump’s authority to continue military conflict with Iran without congressional approval.
  • The Senate must take up the resolution soon under the war powers law.
  • This was the fourth House vote to try to restrict Trump’s power regarding the conflict, which has lasted over 90 days.
  • Earlier efforts to pass similar resolutions faced delays and cancellations.
  • The vote comes amid ongoing, unsuccessful efforts to negotiate a settlement with Iran.
  • Some Senate Republicans previously joined Democrats to advance a similar resolution.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

WATCH:  David Muir shares Texas high school principal's surprise from graduating class

WATCH: David Muir shares Texas high school principal's surprise from graduating class

Summary

A Texas high school principal known as "Coach Mutt" received a surprise handwritten letter from the graduating class during their graduation ceremony. The note was a meaningful gesture to show appreciation for the principal's impact on the students.

Key Facts

  • The principal is from a high school in Texas.
  • He is affectionately called "Coach Mutt" by the school community.
  • The surprise took place at the graduation event.
  • The graduating class wrote a heartfelt, handwritten letter to him.
  • The letter expressed gratitude and appreciation.
  • The story was shared by journalist David Muir.
  • This event was covered by ABC News.
  • The letter was an unexpected and emotional moment for the principal.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Tech industry wins big in California primary election with millions spent paying off

Tech industry wins big in California primary election with millions spent paying off

Summary

The tech industry spent millions of dollars supporting candidates in California’s primary election. While their favorite candidate for governor lost, several other candidates backed by tech companies and related political groups won or advanced to November’s election.

Key Facts

  • Silicon Valley tech companies and executives spent tens of millions on California primary elections.
  • Matt Mahan, a tech-backed candidate for governor, received about $50 million but came in sixth place with 4% of the vote.
  • Scott Weiner, supported by the tech industry for U.S. Senate, won the most votes in the primary and will advance to the November midterms.
  • Ben Allen, backed by tech, is likely advancing for state insurance commissioner.
  • Two major Super PACs, Grow California (funded by crypto leaders) and California Leads (funded by Google and Meta), contributed millions to local legislative races.
  • Most candidates supported by these Super PACs, especially Democrats, are advancing to the next election stage.
  • The tech industry’s goal is to place preferred lawmakers in California’s state legislature to influence regulations and policies.
  • Experts expect tech spending on political campaigns to increase significantly before the November midterms.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

House tensions erupt as Rashida Tlaib pushes vote to constrain Trump on Lebanon

House tensions erupt as Rashida Tlaib pushes vote to constrain Trump on Lebanon

Summary

Rep. Rashida Tlaib is pushing for a House vote on a resolution to limit President Trump's war powers in Lebanon. This has caused strong disagreements among Democrats and Republicans, leading to a heated debate that stopped the House from working for over an hour.

Key Facts

  • Rashida Tlaib wants Congress to vote on a resolution about U.S. military actions in Lebanon.
  • The resolution has split Democrats, with some worried it could interfere with current U.S. operations.
  • Rep. Max Miller called Hezbollah a terrorist group and criticized Tlaib’s support of them.
  • Miller’s contentious remarks were removed from the official record after debate.
  • Some Democrats want to change the resolution to avoid harming U.S. support for Lebanon’s military and embassy.
  • Anti-war groups support Tlaib’s resolution and want action soon.
  • There is disagreement on whether to vote now or wait to amend the resolution to gain more support.
  • The vote is expected to divide the Democratic party due to differing views on U.S. involvement in Lebanon.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

6/3: The Takeout with Major Garrett

6/3: The Takeout with Major Garrett

Summary

The House of Representatives passed a measure aimed at limiting President Donald Trump's actions regarding Iran. Despite recent attacks, President Trump said that talks with Iran are still happening.

Key Facts

  • The House passed a measure to control or limit President Trump's decisions about Iran.
  • President Trump stated that discussions or negotiations with Iran are ongoing.
  • The context includes a recent attack involving Iran.
  • The news was covered by CBS News in a segment called "The Takeout with Major Garrett."
  • The measure reflects congressional efforts to influence U.S. policy toward Iran.
  • President Trump is actively engaging in dialogue with Iran according to his statements.
  • The coverage was dated June 3rd (6/3).
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

House delivers rebuke to Trump with vote to end Iran war

House delivers rebuke to Trump with vote to end Iran war

Summary

The U.S. House of Representatives voted 215-208 to pass a resolution that limits President Donald Trump’s powers to conduct war against Iran without Congressional approval. The vote is mostly symbolic and does not legally force the president to stop military actions but sends a strong message from Congress about the conflict.

Key Facts

  • The House vote was on a resolution to end U.S. military involvement in hostilities with Iran unless Congress authorizes it.
  • The resolution passed with bipartisan support, including four Republicans joining Democrats.
  • The resolution is a concurrent resolution, which means it does not have the force of law and the president cannot veto it.
  • This is the fourth time the House has voted on a similar Iran war powers resolution since the conflict began three months ago.
  • The resolution now moves to the Senate for consideration.
  • President Trump’s administration said the vote was influenced by some Republicans being absent and reaffirmed the president’s authority as Commander-in-Chief.
  • House Foreign Affairs ranking Democrat Gregory Meeks said Congress is demanding an explanation for the U.S. entering the war.
  • House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed concern that limiting the president’s authority could harm negotiation efforts with Iran.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Bari Weiss: Scott Pelley fired from ’60 Minutes’ for breaking ‘foundation’ of trust

Bari Weiss: Scott Pelley fired from ’60 Minutes’ for breaking ‘foundation’ of trust

Summary

CBS News fired Scott Pelley, a longtime correspondent for the show "60 Minutes," due to a breach of trust. The head of CBS News explained the decision during a staff meeting, emphasizing the importance of trust in the newsroom.

Key Facts

  • Scott Pelley was a longtime correspondent for "60 Minutes."
  • CBS News decided to fire him.
  • The firing was related to a breach of trust.
  • The head of CBS News addressed staff about this decision.
  • The explanation came from an audio transcript reported by The New York Times.
  • The leader stressed the newsroom must be based on trust and mutual respect.
  • The news concerns CBS News’ internal management and staffing.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

WATCH:  Child survives after being thrown from car in crash

WATCH: Child survives after being thrown from car in crash

Summary

A child was thrown from a car during a crash outside Atlanta but survived with only minor injuries. Dashcam video captured the incident, which is being described as a miracle.

Key Facts

  • The crash happened outside Atlanta.
  • Dashcam footage shows a boy being thrown from the vehicle when it crashed.
  • The child survived the crash.
  • The injuries to the child were minor.
  • Authorities and witnesses called the survival "nothing short of a miracle."
  • The incident occurred recently, reported on June 3, 2026.
  • The video was shared publicly, drawing attention to the event.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Jan. 6 defendants still eyeing payouts, despite scrapped $1.8B fund

Jan. 6 defendants still eyeing payouts, despite scrapped $1.8B fund

Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice canceled a planned $1.8 billion fund meant to compensate some people arrested after the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. Despite this, a lawyer representing many January 6 defendants is filing claims and lawsuits seeking financial compensation, supported by President Donald Trump, who said these individuals should be reimbursed.

Key Facts

  • The Department of Justice ended plans for an "Anti-Weaponization Fund" worth $1.8 billion.
  • A lawyer named Peter Ticktin is representing around 400 January 6 defendants in claims and lawsuits against the federal government.
  • Ticktin has already filed claims for about 200 clients and plans to file for 200 more.
  • The recent lawsuit asks for at least $1 million in damages for each of nine plaintiffs.
  • The plaintiffs claim they were wrongly prosecuted and faced unfair treatment by law enforcement.
  • Seven of these plaintiffs were convicted but later pardoned by President Trump.
  • President Trump has publicly supported efforts to compensate those charged after January 6.
  • Under federal law, individuals harmed by the government can seek payouts through the Federal Tort Claims Act and may sue if claims are ignored.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Why it takes days or even weeks for California to count votes

Why it takes days or even weeks for California to count votes

Summary

California often takes days or weeks to finalize election results because it counts mail-in ballots that arrive up to a week after Election Day. The state has 23 million registered voters, and election officials must carefully check signatures on mail-in ballots, which slows down the process. The final results for the current election are due by July 3, 2026.

Key Facts

  • California allows mail-in ballots postmarked on or before Election Day to be counted if received within seven days after the election.
  • County officials have up to 30 days after the election to count all ballots.
  • Signature verification for each mail-in ballot slows down counting as signatures must be matched to records.
  • Initial vote counts include early mail, early in-person, and day-of ballots.
  • Early voting results are counted before Election Day but not released until polls close.
  • Final vote counts can change because late-arriving mail ballots may still affect outcomes.
  • The Supreme Court is considering a case that could end the practice of counting late-arriving mail ballots.
  • President Donald Trump opposes universal mail-in voting, claiming it risks fraud, though studies show voter fraud in mail ballots is rare.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Why Social Security checks could be $500 less each month by 2032

Why Social Security checks could be $500 less each month by 2032

Summary

A report predicts that Social Security payments might be cut by up to $500 each month by 2032. People living in certain states could face larger reductions in their Social Security checks than those in other states.

Key Facts

  • Social Security payments may decrease significantly starting in 2032.
  • The estimated cut could be as much as $500 per month for some beneficiaries.
  • The size of the cut is expected to vary depending on the state where a person lives.
  • Some states will see bigger payment reductions than others.
  • Social Security provides monthly income to retired and disabled people.
  • The report highlights concerns about the future financial stability of the Social Security system.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

CBS News editor-in-chief addresses Scott Pelley's firing

CBS News editor-in-chief addresses Scott Pelley's firing

Summary

Scott Pelley, a correspondent for the TV show "60 Minutes" and a former anchor for "CBS Evening News," was fired on Tuesday. The editor-in-chief of CBS News spoke about his firing.

Key Facts

  • Scott Pelley worked as a correspondent on "60 Minutes."
  • He also was the anchor for "CBS Evening News" in the past.
  • CBS News fired Scott Pelley on a Tuesday.
  • The editor-in-chief of CBS News made a statement about the firing.
  • Reporters Jim Axelrod and Tony Dokoupil provided more details on the story.
  • The incident was covered in the CBS News app and on their website.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

OSU OKs $100M deal to settle sexual-abuse cases

OSU OKs $100M deal to settle sexual-abuse cases

Summary

Ohio State University has agreed to pay about $100 million to settle hundreds of legal claims from former student athletes. The claims say these athletes were sexually abused many years ago by a doctor at the university.

Key Facts

  • Ohio State University will pay around $100 million in a settlement.
  • The settlement resolves hundreds of legal claims from past student athletes.
  • The claims involve sexual abuse by a university doctor.
  • The abuse happened decades ago.
  • The victims were former student athletes at Ohio State.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Republican-led House passes war powers vote

Republican-led House passes war powers vote

Summary

The Republican-led House of Representatives approved a law that would require President Trump to end all military actions against Iran. This is the first time this kind of vote has passed since the conflict with Iran began, but the Senate still needs to approve it.

Key Facts

  • The House of Representatives is controlled by Republicans.
  • They passed a war powers resolution regarding military action against Iran.
  • The resolution requires President Trump to stop all military actions against Iran.
  • This is the first time such a measure has passed since the conflict started.
  • The legislation now moves to the Senate for consideration.
  • The vote reflects concerns about the use of military force without congressional approval.
  • The war with Iran refers to ongoing tensions and actions between the U.S. and Iran, not a formally declared war.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

California awaits official primary results

California awaits official primary results

Summary

California is counting votes from its primary elections. Early results suggest that two new Republican candidates and Democratic Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass will move on to the November election.

Key Facts

  • California is still counting votes from its primary elections.
  • Two Republican candidates who are new to politics are expected to advance.
  • Karen Bass, the current mayor of Los Angeles and a Democrat, is projected to move to the runoff election.
  • The runoff will happen in November.
  • The information comes from CBS News projections.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Sean Strickland Says White House Banned Him From UFC Card

Sean Strickland Says White House Banned Him From UFC Card

Summary

UFC fighter Sean Strickland says the White House stopped him from attending a UFC event held there, claiming it was because of his critical comments about President Donald Trump and U.S. foreign policy. The White House has not confirmed this claim. The event, called UFC Freedom 250, is a special fight card marking the 250th anniversary of the United States and will take place on the White House grounds.

Key Facts

  • Sean Strickland, a UFC middleweight champion, says he was banned from attending UFC Freedom 250 at the White House.
  • Strickland alleges the ban was political retaliation for his criticism of President Donald Trump and U.S. foreign policy.
  • The White House has not confirmed or denied Strickland’s claim.
  • UFC Freedom 250 is scheduled for June 14, 2026, held on the South Lawn of the White House.
  • The event celebrates the 250th anniversary of the United States and is led by President Trump and UFC CEO Dana White.
  • The card will have a limited, invitation-only audience including VIPs, military personnel, and global figures.
  • UFC Freedom 250 will feature a headline fight between Ilia Topuria and Justin Gaethje.
  • Former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene publicly supported Strickland and criticized the Trump administration for his treatment.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Trump declines to say whether he's dropped "anti-weaponization" fund plans

Trump declines to say whether he's dropped "anti-weaponization" fund plans

Summary

President Donald Trump praised the idea of creating an "anti-weaponization" fund but did not confirm if he has dropped plans to establish it. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told lawmakers the fund would be canceled after a federal judge temporarily blocked its creation.

Key Facts

  • President Trump called the "anti-weaponization" fund idea "the greatest thing."
  • He declined to say if he has stopped plans to create the fund.
  • Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche informed lawmakers that the fund would be dropped.
  • The decision to drop the fund came after a federal judge temporarily blocked its establishment.
  • The "anti-weaponization" fund is a White House proposal.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

FBI kills hostage-taker in California after 15-hour standoff

FBI kills hostage-taker in California after 15-hour standoff

Summary

A 15-hour standoff at a bank in Bakersfield, California, ended when the FBI freed all the hostages and killed the suspect. The situation took place on Wednesday and involved a hostage-taker inside the bank building.

Key Facts

  • The incident occurred in Bakersfield, California.
  • A hostage-taker held people inside a bank building.
  • The standoff lasted about 15 hours.
  • The FBI was involved in resolving the situation.
  • All hostages were released safely.
  • The suspect was killed by the FBI.
  • The event happened on a Wednesday.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Senate Republicans move forward on ICE funding package, but it faces roadblocks ahead

Senate Republicans move forward on ICE funding package, but it faces roadblocks ahead

Summary

Senate Republicans voted along party lines to advance a budget package funding ICE and Customs and Border Patrol after the Justice Department said it would cancel a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund." This fund was created to compensate people who claim they were wrongly targeted under the Biden administration, but some Republicans opposed it. Despite moving forward, the bill still faces challenges, including expected Democratic amendments.

Key Facts

  • Senate Republicans advanced a budget package funding immigration enforcement agencies like ICE and Customs and Border Patrol.
  • The vote was along party lines.
  • The Justice Department announced it will cancel the $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund."
  • The fund was intended to compensate people who claim they were unfairly targeted under the Biden administration.
  • Some Republicans opposed the fund and delayed the funding package over concerns about it.
  • Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche said the administration would not move forward with the fund, which eased some Republican concerns.
  • The bill now faces a "vote-a-rama," a long voting session where both parties can propose amendments.
  • Democrats plan to propose amendments to remove or limit the fund completely.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

NHS staff should be banned from wearing pro-Palestinian badges, report recommends

NHS staff should be banned from wearing pro-Palestinian badges, report recommends

Summary

A government report recommends banning NHS staff from wearing political badges, such as pro-Palestinian symbols, to reduce antisemitism and protect patient trust. The report also calls for better action against racism in the NHS and more support for Jewish staff and patients who face discrimination.

Key Facts

  • The report was produced by Lord Mann, the government's independent adviser on antisemitism.
  • It suggests NHS staff should not wear political badges on their uniforms, including pro-Palestinian or pro-Israel badges.
  • The report found that some Jewish NHS staff and patients feel they must hide their religious identity due to antisemitism.
  • Recommendations include stronger accountability for NHS managers and improved recording of racist incidents.
  • Some Jewish patients avoid seeking medical care because of fears of antisemitism.
  • The government plans to fully accept and act on the report’s recommendations.
  • There are concerns about "routine ostracism" causing some Jewish NHS workers to leave or change careers.
  • NHS England is expected to consult on adopting the new badge and uniform policies.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.