Account

The Actual News

Just the Facts, from multiple news sources.

US News

Latest developments and key stories from across the United States

Minister dismisses Labour rebels as ‘usual suspects’; Starmer prepares for final PMQs of parliamentary session – UK politics live

Minister dismisses Labour rebels as ‘usual suspects’; Starmer prepares for final PMQs of parliamentary session – UK politics live

Summary

Labour leader Keir Starmer faced a vote in Parliament where some Labour MPs rebelled by voting with a Conservative motion from Kemi Badenoch. Although about 15 Labour MPs supported the motion, the government easily won the vote, and Labour leadership showed no strong intent to punish the rebels severely.

Key Facts

  • Keir Starmer anticipated the last Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) session of the 2024-26 Parliament to reflect on recent laws.
  • Labour rebelled against party instructions with 15 MPs voting for a Conservative motion by Kemi Badenoch.
  • Around 53 Labour MPs did not vote, either absent or abstaining deliberately.
  • Starmer previously removed party discipline (the whip) from seven MPs for voting with the Scottish National Party on a related matter.
  • Housing Secretary Steve Reed called the rebels “usual suspects” and downplayed the chance of stricter punishments.
  • Reed highlighted upcoming renters’ rights reforms as a key government focus, asking Labour to unite behind the prime minister.
  • The day’s agenda included PMQs at noon, the formal pause of Parliament in the House of Lords at 1:15 pm, and a press conference by Lib Dem leader Ed Davey about keeping foreign influencers out of UK politics.
  • Labour discipline debates and the government’s legislative achievements are central during this Parliamentary session’s end.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Candidate Backed by Zohran Mamdani Loses Election: What It Means

Candidate Backed by Zohran Mamdani Loses Election: What It Means

Summary

Carl Wilson won a New York City council race on Manhattan’s West Side, defeating Lindsay Boylan, who was endorsed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani. Wilson’s win makes him the fifth openly gay member representing a Manhattan district at the heart of the city’s LGBTQ community.

Key Facts

  • Carl Wilson won a city council race covering parts of Manhattan’s West Side.
  • Lindsay Boylan was endorsed by Mayor Zohran Mamdani but lost the race.
  • The race is important because it tested the influence of Mamdani’s endorsements.
  • Wilson will be the fifth openly gay council member from Manhattan.
  • The election uses ranked-choice voting, so final results depend on redistributed votes until a candidate gets over 50%.
  • Preliminary results showed Wilson leading with about 43% of first-choice votes; Boylan had about 26%.
  • The race also highlighted a rivalry between Mayor Mamdani and Council Speaker Julie Menin, who supported Wilson.
  • Boylan publicly accused former Governor Andrew Cuomo of sexual harassment, which he denies.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Beau Lamarre-Condon’s mother charged after allegedly attempting to influence key witness in double murder trial

Beau Lamarre-Condon’s mother charged after allegedly attempting to influence key witness in double murder trial

Summary

The mother of a former police officer charged with two murders has been arrested for trying to influence a witness in her son’s trial. The officer is accused of killing two people with his police gun and is awaiting a trial set for September.

Key Facts

  • Coleen Lamarre, 63, was arrested and charged with interfering with a witness in her son’s murder trial.
  • She is a former New South Wales police employee and was denied bail.
  • Her son, Beaumont Lamarre-Condon, faces charges of killing Luke Davies and Jesse Baird in February 2024.
  • The victims’ bodies were found in surfboard bags on a rural property near Sydney.
  • Lamarre-Condon allegedly shot the couple and tried to hide their bodies; he is currently in custody.
  • He was fired from the police force weeks after the alleged murders.
  • Lamarre-Condon’s initial high-profile lawyer was replaced by legal aid, which later withdrew, and now he has a new solicitor.
  • The case caused controversy around the police’s participation in the Sydney Mardi Gras parade and comments from a former police commissioner.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Hegseth will be grilled by Congress for the first time since the Iran war began

Hegseth will be grilled by Congress for the first time since the Iran war began

Summary

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth will be questioned by Congress for the first time since the U.S. started the war with Iran. The hearings will focus on the 2027 military budget, the costs and impacts of the Iran war, and recent changes in military leadership.

Key Facts

  • President Donald Trump launched the war against Iran on February 28, 2026, without congressional approval.
  • Defense Secretary Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine will discuss the proposed $1.5 trillion defense budget.
  • The budget request emphasizes more drones, missile defenses, and warships.
  • Democrats criticize the war as costly, highlight munitions shortages, and mention civilian casualties like the bombing of a school.
  • There is concern about U.S. military preparedness against Iranian drone attacks that caused American casualties.
  • The U.S. and Israel maintain a naval blockade of Iranian shipping, responding to Iran's closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which has raised global fuel prices.
  • Hegseth has removed several top military leaders during the conflict, raising questions from lawmakers.
  • Hearings will take place before both the House and Senate Armed Services Committees.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Rightwing provocateur’s plan to register ‘Free Palestine party’ renews concern over Victoria’s voting system

Rightwing provocateur’s plan to register ‘Free Palestine party’ renews concern over Victoria’s voting system

Summary

Avi Yemini, a rightwing activist in Victoria, Australia, plans to register a "Free Palestine party" for the state election to direct votes to conservative parties. This use of Victoria’s group voting ticket system, which allows parties to control vote preferences, has raised concerns about the fairness of the voting process.

Key Facts

  • Avi Yemini, a former Israeli soldier and activist, wants to register a "Free Palestine party" for Victoria’s state election.
  • The party aims to pass votes to conservative parties through the group voting ticket (GVT) system.
  • Victoria is the only Australian state still using GVTs, where voters select one party and that party distributes preferences if eliminated.
  • Critics say this system allows small parties to influence outcomes with very few first-choice votes.
  • The Labor-led committee recommended ending GVTs before the 2026 election, but it has not yet happened.
  • Opposition parties like the Liberals and Greens want to abolish GVTs to prevent manipulation.
  • Some Labor MPs support scrapping GVTs but the party has delayed action partly due to concerns about aiding the One Nation party.
  • Glenn Druery, known as a "preference whisperer," helps arrange vote deals between small parties and is involved in the controversy.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Woman harassed and beeped at by catcallers reports their untaxed van to DVLA

Woman harassed and beeped at by catcallers reports their untaxed van to DVLA

Summary

A woman named Aneesa was catcalled and harassed by two men in an untaxed van while crossing a busy road in Cardiff. She filmed the incident, reported the men to the police, and also reported the untaxed vehicle to the government agency DVLA.

Key Facts

  • Aneesa and her sister were catcalled by men in a van while crossing Newport Road in Cardiff.
  • The van driver repeatedly beeped aggressively to get their attention.
  • Aneesa recorded the men and posted the video on social media.
  • The vehicle was found to be untaxed, so Aneesa reported it to the DVLA (Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency).
  • Aneesa plans to report the men to the police for harassment.
  • Harassment like catcalling is a criminal offense in the UK but remains common.
  • Many women experience catcalling, which is considered a form of intimidation and violence against women.
  • Aneesa’s sister was scared by the incident and canceled a planned solo trip afterward.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

I shouldn't have been made to visit abusive killer mum

I shouldn't have been made to visit abusive killer mum

Summary

Kelly Higgins experienced abuse from her birth mother, Bernadette McNeilly, who was jailed for a brutal murder in 1993 but still kept some legal rights over her children. Kelly and others are calling for laws to change so abusive parents cannot have any control or visitation rights that may cause further harm to children.

Key Facts

  • Bernadette McNeilly was jailed for life for her role in torturing and murdering Suzanne Capper in 1993.
  • Despite being in prison, McNeilly retained some parental rights over her children, including approval for certain decisions like holidays and piercings.
  • Kelly Higgins and her brother were abused physically by McNeilly, with reports to social services and police allegedly ignored.
  • Kelly was forced to visit her mother in prison, which caused emotional pain due to conflicting feelings toward an abusive parent.
  • Kelly and her foster mother say that transferring full parental rights to foster parents could protect children better and encourage fostering.
  • The Ministry of Justice has introduced some restrictions on parental rights in cases involving severe crimes, but Kelly believes these measures are insufficient.
  • Kelly credits her foster parents' love and care for her well-being today.
  • The situation highlights concerns about how the law handles parental rights for convicted abusive parents.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

US Senate blocks bid to stop Trump using military against Cuba

US Senate blocks bid to stop Trump using military against Cuba

Summary

The US Senate rejected a resolution that would have stopped President Donald Trump from using the military against Cuba without Congress's permission. The vote was mostly along party lines, with Republicans saying no current war exists with Cuba and the president’s powers do not need limiting.

Key Facts

  • The Senate vote was 51 to 47, mostly divided by party.
  • The resolution aimed to require congressional approval before military action against Cuba.
  • Republican Senator Rick Scott led the move to block the resolution, saying no troops had been sent to Cuba.
  • Democrats argued the US economic blockade on Cuba counts as a hostile act.
  • President Trump has threatened Cuba multiple times and said "Cuba is next" for US action.
  • Recent US military operations in Venezuela did not have congressional approval.
  • The US Constitution says only Congress can declare war, but presidents can act quickly against threats.
  • The White House says President Trump is acting within his commander-in-chief authority.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Should Jimmy Kimmel be fired for telling a joke?

Should Jimmy Kimmel be fired for telling a joke?

Summary

Jimmy Kimmel, a late-night TV host, made a joke about First Lady Melania Trump, calling her an "expectant widow." After the White House asked ABC to fire Kimmel, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) began an early review of Disney’s TV broadcast licenses. Disney says its stations follow FCC rules.

Key Facts

  • Jimmy Kimmel joked about First Lady Melania Trump, using the term "expectant widow."
  • This joke came just before a shooting incident at the White House Correspondents' Dinner.
  • The White House urged ABC, Kimmel’s network, to fire him over the joke.
  • The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) started an early review of Disney’s TV broadcast licenses after the complaint.
  • Disney is ABC’s parent company and said its stations follow all FCC guidelines.
  • The situation has raised questions about comedy, broadcasting rules, and political sensitivities.
  • The incident took place amid ongoing political tensions surrounding President Donald Trump’s administration.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Earlier specialised care could prevent 10,000 miscarriages a year, UK study finds

Earlier specialised care could prevent 10,000 miscarriages a year, UK study finds

Summary

A UK study found that giving women specialized care after their first miscarriage could prevent about 10,000 future miscarriages each year. Currently, women can access this care only after three miscarriages, but experts and charities recommend offering it earlier to improve health and reduce pregnancy losses.

Key Facts

  • Women in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland get NHS specialist care only after three miscarriages.
  • Tommy’s charity suggests care after just one miscarriage to help prevent future losses.
  • Scotland already offers a graded model of care starting after one miscarriage.
  • The study involved 406 women and showed a 4% drop in future miscarriage risk with the graded care model.
  • Graded care includes nurse advice on vitamin D, folic acid, alcohol, and caffeine after one miscarriage.
  • Women receiving specialist care were 47% more likely to have risks identified and addressed.
  • One in five women with two miscarriages had thyroid problems or anemia detected through specialist care.
  • About 25% of pregnancies end in miscarriage, mostly within the first 12 weeks.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Rebel Wilson rejects ‘absolutely outrageous’ phone-dumping accusation as defamation trial continues

Rebel Wilson rejects ‘absolutely outrageous’ phone-dumping accusation as defamation trial continues

Summary

Rebel Wilson is involved in a defamation trial where she denies accusations that she deleted her phone to avoid sharing messages related to the case. The lawsuit filed by Charlotte MacInnes claims Wilson defamed her by saying she lied about a sexual harassment complaint.

Key Facts

  • Charlotte MacInnes sued Rebel Wilson for defamation over social media posts.
  • MacInnes says Wilson called her a liar and accused her of retracting a sexual harassment complaint.
  • Wilson says MacInnes told her she felt uncomfortable after a co-producer asked to shower and bathe together.
  • Wilson’s phone was stolen in London, so she couldn’t provide some requested messages.
  • MacInnes denies ever complaining about feeling uncomfortable and denies retracting a complaint.
  • MacInnes claims Wilson hacked her Snapchat, causing a nude photo leak to her contacts.
  • Wilson denies lying, bullying, or hacking MacInnes’ accounts.
  • The case involves discussion about texts between Wilson and MacInnes regarding a theater invite.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Fashion, billionaires and jokes: Inside the White House state dinner for the King and Queen

Fashion, billionaires and jokes: Inside the White House state dinner for the King and Queen

Summary

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump held a White House state dinner to honor King Charles and Queen Camilla during a visit celebrating 250 years of American independence. The event highlighted the special relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom with speeches, gifts, and a formal meal inspired by English gardens.

Key Facts

  • The dinner was held at the White House and decorated with cherry blossoms and spring flowers.
  • President Trump and King Charles made speeches celebrating the strong bond between the US and UK.
  • King Charles gave President Trump a bell from a World War II Royal Navy submarine as a gift.
  • The menu included garden herb soup, herb ravioli, dover sole fish, and a chocolate dessert shaped like a beehive.
  • Over 100 guests attended, including members of the president’s cabinet, Supreme Court justices, Republican lawmakers, business leaders, and TV hosts.
  • Notable attendees were Jeff Bezos, Amazon founder, and Tim Cook, Apple CEO.
  • The event marked the 250th anniversary of US independence and celebrated the historic ties between the two nations.
  • First Lady Melania Trump led the preparations for the dinner.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Trump to feature on limited-edition US passports for 250th anniversary

Trump to feature on limited-edition US passports for 250th anniversary

Summary

President Donald Trump will appear on a special, limited-edition U.S. passport made to celebrate the country's 250th anniversary in July. These passports will include his portrait, signature, and images related to American history, and will be available at the Washington Passport Agency while supplies last.

Key Facts

  • The limited-edition passport will feature President Trump’s portrait and signature in gold.
  • The passport design includes elements from the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. flag.
  • Another page will show the Founding Fathers signing the Declaration of Independence.
  • These special passports will start being issued in summer 2026 at the Washington Passport Agency.
  • Current passports already show historic American images like the Star-Spangled Banner and the Apollo 11 Moon landing.
  • This passport design is part of broader 250th anniversary celebrations planned for July 2026.
  • President Trump has added his image to other national symbols, such as park passes and proposed $1 coins.
  • Trump has pushed to place his name and image on public buildings and infrastructure in Washington, DC.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Powerful storm rips North Texas city, causing significant damage, injuries

Powerful storm rips North Texas city, causing significant damage, injuries

Summary

A strong storm hit Mineral Wells, a city in North Texas, causing major damage and injuries. City officials said several people were hurt, but no deaths were reported, and emergency crews are still working to assess the full impact.

Key Facts

  • The storm caused serious damage in Mineral Wells, including shredded buildings and damaged roofs.
  • Injuries were reported, but none were life-threatening.
  • An industrial park suffered heavy damage, including an HVAC plant.
  • Employees were sent home before the storm arrived, preventing workplace injuries.
  • Debris, downed trees, and leaning power lines were spread across the area.
  • A curfew was set at 10 p.m. and people were told to stay indoors and avoid travel in the damaged northeast region.
  • The storm included severe thunderstorms with tornado warnings, strong winds, and large hail across North Texas.
  • Damage was confirmed along Highway 180, from Country Club Estates to Lake Mineral Wells State Park.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Ringleader of $250M fraud scheme leaked protected documents from jail, prosecutors say

Ringleader of $250M fraud scheme leaked protected documents from jail, prosecutors say

Summary

Aimee Bock, leading a $250 million fraud case called Feeding Our Future, is accused of having her son leak protected government documents from jail. Prosecutors claim she directed him to share these materials with media and politicians to reduce her blame before sentencing.

Key Facts

  • Aimee Bock is the main person behind the Feeding Our Future fraud case involving $250 million.
  • Prosecutors say she told her son to download and share secret court documents starting in February.
  • The leaked documents were sent to Minnesota lawmakers, reporters, and political groups, including Republicans in Washington, DC.
  • Bock allegedly instructed her son to remove court labels on the documents before sending them out.
  • A reporter from the Minnesota Star Tribune got copies of protected government documents, violating a court order.
  • Prosecutors believe Bock or someone working for her leaked these documents.
  • Bock claimed her lawyer and a newspaper editor planned to publish a story that would help her case.
  • The U.S. Attorney’s Office wants the court to punish Bock and take control of her Dropbox account to stop further leaks.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

California governor candidates struggle for standout moments at feisty debate

California governor candidates struggle for standout moments at feisty debate

Summary

California candidates for governor had a lively debate but found it hard to stand out. The race is notable because former Representative Eric Swalwell recently left the contest, and several Democrats as well as a Republican backed by President Donald Trump are competing.

Key Facts

  • The debate included multiple candidates running for governor of California.
  • Former Representative Eric Swalwell left the race recently.
  • Democrats in the race include Attorney General Xavier Becerra, billionaire Tom Steyer, and former Representative Katie Porter.
  • There are at least eight candidates in total.
  • Republican Steve Hilton is supported by President Donald Trump.
  • Candidates tried to have memorable moments during the debate but struggled to do so.
  • The race is competitive with candidates seeking to gain attention from voters.
  • The event took place on a Tuesday.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

How does Comey's 'threat' against Trump compare to other defendants charged by DOJ?

How does Comey's 'threat' against Trump compare to other defendants charged by DOJ?

Summary

James Comey, the former FBI director, was indicted for allegedly threatening President Donald Trump through a social media post. The Department of Justice says Comey's case is similar to other cases involving threats against public officials, but the details show some differences in how threatening the messages were.

Key Facts

  • James Comey was indicted for a social media post showing seashells arranged as "86 47," seen as a coded threat against President Trump.
  • Comey said he did not know the numbers were linked to violence and condemned all violence.
  • Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche compared Comey's indictment to other cases where people threatened the president or public officials.
  • Diego Villavicencio pleaded guilty to threatening Trump and others, including saying, "I'll kill you and your family," and planning harm at Mar-a-Lago.
  • Michael James Ferr was sentenced to prison for threatening to kill President Biden and members of his family and threatening a Secret Service agent.
  • A man in Massachusetts was charged for threatening Trump on Facebook and allegedly brandished a sword during arrest. He pleaded not guilty and awaits trial.
  • A 23-year-old man in Kentucky was charged for posting violent anti-Trump messages on social media.
  • The DOJ treats threats against public officials seriously and prosecutes such crimes regularly.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Judge tosses Trump admin. lawsuit seeking access to Arizona voter data

Judge tosses Trump admin. lawsuit seeking access to Arizona voter data

Summary

A federal judge dismissed a Justice Department lawsuit demanding Arizona’s voter registration data, ruling the law cited does not allow the federal government to obtain the information. This is another loss for the Justice Department in its efforts to get voter data from states as part of an election oversight push led under President Donald Trump.

Key Facts

  • The judge ruled against the Justice Department’s request for Arizona’s statewide voter registration list.
  • The judge said a 1960 civil rights law does not give the Attorney General the right to access the data.
  • Arizona officials opposed sharing the voter data because it includes sensitive personal information.
  • This ruling is the sixth time the Justice Department lost similar lawsuits in other states.
  • The Justice Department wanted full names, birthdates, addresses, and driver's license or partial social security numbers.
  • The Justice Department claims it needs the data to check if states are following federal voting laws.
  • The federal government planned to cross-check voter data with Homeland Security records to find noncitizen voters.
  • President Trump supports stronger federal control over elections and has pushed for laws requiring citizenship proof to register and vote.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

How the King and Queen spent their second day in the US

How the King and Queen spent their second day in the US

Summary

King Charles III and Queen Camilla visited Washington DC during their state visit to the US. They met President Donald Trump's cabinet, the King spoke to US Congress for America's 250th anniversary, and they attended a dinner at the White House where a special gift was exchanged.

Key Facts

  • King Charles III and Queen Camilla visited Washington DC on their state visit.
  • They met members of President Donald Trump's cabinet.
  • The King gave a speech to both houses of US Congress, marking America's 250th anniversary.
  • The King gave President Trump a bell from his World War II submarine named "HMS Trump".
  • President Trump praised the United Kingdom during the White House state dinner.
  • This was the first visit by a reigning British monarch to the US since Queen Elizabeth II met President George W. Bush in 2007.
  • The King and Queen planned to travel to New York City for a memorial service for the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

US appeals court rejects Trump’s immigration detention policy

US appeals court rejects Trump’s immigration detention policy

Summary

A US appeals court ruled against the Trump administration’s policy of holding most immigrants arrested in the country without letting them request bond for release. The court said the policy misinterpreted immigration law and could harm families and communities.

Key Facts

  • The New York-based US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled 3-0 against the mandatory detention policy.
  • The court said the Trump administration wrongly treated many non-citizens living in the US as new arrivals subject to automatic detention without bond.
  • The policy was based on the 1996 Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act.
  • The court said the government’s interpretation ignored the law’s meaning and long-standing government practices.
  • Under the policy, immigrants with no criminal records who had lived in the US for years were denied bond hearings.
  • Previous administrations usually allowed bond requests for non-criminal immigrants arrested away from the border.
  • The ruling supports a New York judge’s order to release a Brazilian immigrant detained for over 20 years in the US.
  • Other appeals courts have supported the policy, so the Supreme Court may decide the issue next.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.