July 13, 2025

Account

The Actual News

Just the Facts, from multiple news sources.

US News

Latest developments and key stories from across the United States

Murders are down nationwide. Researchers point to a key reason

Murders have decreased significantly in many U.S. cities after they increased in 2020 and 2021. Experts believe this drop is mainly due to new investments in communities from both the government and private organizations.

Key Facts:

  • Murders have gone down significantly in many U.S. cities.
  • There was a rise in murders in 2020 and 2021.
  • Analysts suggest that the decrease is due to new community investments.
  • Both government and private organizations provided the investment.
  • These efforts followed disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Source Information

Trump says ruling is 'monumental' as he thanks Supreme Court

Trump says ruling is 'monumental' as he thanks Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court limited the power of lower courts to stop presidential orders across the entire country. President Donald Trump welcomed the ruling and described it as a significant win for his administration, which had faced challenges from court rulings blocking its policies.

Key Facts:

  • The US Supreme Court made a decision to reduce the ability of lower courts to block presidential actions nationwide.
  • President Trump expressed happiness about the ruling, calling it a significant achievement.
  • The decision is viewed as a win for the Trump administration, which faced previous legal obstacles.
  • Trump mentioned the ruling would help his administration implement its policies more effectively.
  • The decision impacts how presidential orders are challenged and could streamline policy enforcement.

Source Information

US Supreme Court allows parents to opt out of lessons with LGBT books

US Supreme Court allows parents to opt out of lessons with LGBT books

The US Supreme Court allowed parents in Maryland to opt their children out of reading books with LGBTQ themes in school. The court voted 6-3 in favor of the parents, stating that not allowing opt-outs violated their religious rights while the case continues.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court sided with parents in Maryland who want to opt their children out of reading books with LGBTQ themes.
  • The court's decision was a 6-3 vote.
  • The parents argued that the school’s curriculum violated their religious rights.
  • The court allowed a preliminary injunction, meaning the parents' request to opt out could proceed while the case is ongoing.
  • Justice Samuel Alito wrote that not allowing opt-outs burdens parents' rights to practice their religion freely.
  • The three liberal justices, including Sonia Sotomayor, disagreed, warning of potential chaos in schools.
  • The parents involved come from various religious backgrounds but share a common opposition to LGBTQ-themed books.
  • The school system removed the opt-out choice in 2023 to avoid disruptions and the possible isolation of LGBTQ students.

Source Information

USNS Harvey Milk renamed amid Trump administration efforts to cut DEI

USNS Harvey Milk renamed amid Trump administration efforts to cut DEI

The U.S. Navy has changed the name of the ship USNS Harvey Milk to USNS Oscar V. Peterson. This change is part of efforts to remove names associated with civil rights leaders from military vessels.

Key Facts:

  • The USNS Harvey Milk is now renamed the USNS Oscar V. Peterson.
  • Harvey Milk was a gay civil rights leader and former Navy veteran.
  • The ship was originally named during the Obama administration by Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus.
  • Oscar V. Peterson was a World War II naval officer awarded the Medal of Honor posthumously.
  • Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth announced the renaming.
  • This change aligns with the Trump administration's efforts to remove what they describe as "woke" ideology.
  • The Navy is also reviewing the names of other ships named after various civil rights leaders, women, and people from minority groups.

Source Information

Anna Wintour's legacy and who might replace her as Vogue editor

Anna Wintour's legacy and who might replace her as Vogue editor

Anna Wintour has stepped down as the editor-in-chief of Vogue after 37 years but will continue to oversee Vogue's content as the chief content officer of Condé Nast. She is known for making significant changes to the magazine, such as featuring casual and celebrity-focused covers. Her tenure is noted for transforming fashion's role in pop culture.

Key Facts:

  • Anna Wintour became US Vogue's editor-in-chief in 1988.
  • Her first Vogue cover featured an outside photo of a model in a jacket and jeans, changing traditional expectations.
  • Wintour was hired to keep Vogue innovative as it moved into the 1990s.
  • Over her career, she adapted Vogue from print to digital and social media platforms.
  • She will continue working at Condé Nast as their chief content officer, managing multiple magazines.
  • Wintour introduced a casual, celebrity-focused style to Vogue covers, starting with Madonna.
  • She faced protests over certain fashion choices, such as wearing fur.

Source Information

What is a universal injunction and how did the Supreme Court limit its use?

What is a universal injunction and how did the Supreme Court limit its use?

The Supreme Court has decided to limit the use of "universal injunctions," which are court orders stopping government actions nationwide. This decision means that individual judges will have less power to block executive actions, affecting how policies are enforced nationwide.

Key Facts:

  • A universal injunction is a court order that stops the government from enforcing a law or policy against anyone, not just the people involved in the case.
  • The Supreme Court's decision reduces the power of federal judges to issue these injunctions.
  • A case related to birthright citizenship led to this decision, where judges had previously stopped President Trump's executive order with a universal injunction.
  • The ruling does not address whether the executive order violated any laws, only the judges' power to block it nationwide.
  • Universal injunctions have become more common in the last decade with more executive orders from recent presidents.
  • Some Supreme Court justices have previously criticized universal injunctions because they were not commonly used before the 1960s.
  • A law from 1937 aimed to reduce the power of single judges in similar cases, but its scope was reduced in 1976.
  • The decision is considered a victory for the Trump administration, allowing more freedom to implement its policies.

Source Information

WATCH LIVE: Trump meets with officials from Rwanda and DRC after signing of peace deal

WATCH LIVE: Trump meets with officials from Rwanda and DRC after signing of peace deal

The Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda have signed a peace agreement to help end long-standing conflict in eastern Congo. The deal, supported by the U.S., is expected to improve access to important minerals needed for technology.

Key Facts:

  • Congo and Rwanda signed a peace deal on Friday.
  • The goal is to end ongoing fighting in eastern Congo.
  • The U.S. helped facilitate this agreement.
  • The U.S. is interested in gaining access to minerals needed for technology.
  • President Donald Trump will meet with officials from Congo and Rwanda.
  • The deal follows over 30 years of conflict in the region.
  • Many view the agreement as important but not a quick fix to stopping the violence.

Source Information

5 things to know after the Supreme Court said states can block Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding

5 things to know after the Supreme Court said states can block Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid funding

The U.S. Supreme Court decided that states can block Medicaid payments to Planned Parenthood. Medicaid is a health program for people with low incomes. It covers services like birth control and cancer screenings, but not abortions in many cases. This ruling allows states to stop funding Planned Parenthood for non-abortion-related services.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court ruling lets states stop Medicaid money from going to Planned Parenthood.
  • Medicaid is a health insurance program for people with lower incomes.
  • Medicaid funds often can't be used for abortions, but they can cover other services like birth control and cancer screenings.
  • The decision stems from a 2018 South Carolina order stopping Medicaid payments to abortion providers.
  • The Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling said patients can't always sue to use Medicaid with specific providers.
  • Some people support the ruling as a financial and moral victory against abortion.
  • Others argue it reduces access to important health services for disadvantaged groups.
  • Planned Parenthood has received about $90,000 a year from Medicaid in South Carolina.

Source Information

Judge orders Abrego Garcia to remain in jail after his lawyers raise deportation concerns

Judge orders Abrego Garcia to remain in jail after his lawyers raise deportation concerns

A federal judge in Tennessee decided that Kilmar Abrego Garcia must stay in jail for now. His lawyers asked for this because they are worried he might be deported if he is released. Abrego Garcia was previously deported by mistake and is now facing charges related to human smuggling.

Key Facts:

  • Kilmar Abrego Garcia is currently in jail in Tennessee.
  • His lawyers asked for him to stay in jail to avoid possible deportation upon release.
  • He was mistakenly deported to El Salvador for three months earlier this year.
  • Abrego Garcia is facing federal charges for human smuggling.
  • U.S. officials have given different statements about whether he would be deported if released.
  • A U.S. judge originally ordered his release on bail, saying he was not a flight risk or danger.
  • Immigration authorities, known as ICE, plan to deport him regardless of trial outcomes.
  • Abrego Garcia's previous deportation was due to an "administrative error."

Source Information

US Supreme Court limits courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions

US Supreme Court limits courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that lower courts probably went beyond their power by stopping presidential actions with nationwide bans, affecting the balance between judicial and executive authority. This decision is related to injunctions aimed at blocking President Trump's efforts to change birthright citizenship rules.

Key Facts:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court decided that lower courts overused their authority with nationwide injunctions.
  • Nationwide injunctions are court orders that aim to stop actions across the entire country.
  • The decision focused on orders trying to block President Trump's changes to birthright citizenship.
  • Birthright citizenship is a law that grants citizenship to anyone born in the U.S.
  • The ruling was divided along political lines, with six conservative justices in the majority.
  • Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion.
  • The decision means that nationwide injunctions may only apply to specific cases, not everywhere.
  • This ruling could impact other cases where Trump's policies were halted by lower courts.

Source Information

Political violence is quintessentially American

Political violence is quintessentially American

The article discusses the history and current state of political violence in the United States. It highlights several recent violent incidents involving public figures and mentions that such violence is often linked to racism and political motivations.

Key Facts:

  • The US has a history of violence connected to its founding and political actions.
  • Several violent incidents occurred in June, including shootings and political detentions.
  • On June 14, a vigilante killed two people and wounded others in Minnesota.
  • During a protest in Utah, misfired shots accidentally killed a fashion designer.
  • A shooting in Texas on June 1 targeted a gay Indigenous actor.
  • Political figures, including a US Senator, faced forcible detention by Secret Service agents in June.
  • Political leaders often respond with statements condemning violence, but such statements are seen as ineffective.
  • The US has a history of political violence, including the assassinations of several presidents and other public figures.

Source Information

WATCH LIVE: Rubio hosts peace deal signing ceremony between Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo

WATCH LIVE: Rubio hosts peace deal signing ceremony between Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo

The Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda are set to sign a peace deal in Washington, facilitated by the United States, to address ongoing conflict in eastern Congo. The agreement aims to stop fighting and includes provisions for disarming non-state armed groups. This deal may also open up U.S. access to valuable minerals in the region.

Key Facts:

  • The Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda will sign a peace deal organized by the U.S.
  • The signing is scheduled to take place in Washington.
  • Congo has been affected by conflicts involving more than 100 armed groups, including the M23 rebels.
  • The agreement focuses on stopping hostilities and disarming non-state armed groups.
  • The U.N. has described the situation in eastern Congo as a severe humanitarian crisis.
  • The peace deal may help U.S. companies access minerals critical to technology.
  • Rwanda denies supporting the M23 rebels and says it defends its interests.
  • Analysts say the U.S. may use this deal to counter China's influence in Congo's mineral sector.

Source Information

The Supreme Court gives Trump a wave of victories in a blockbuster final week

The Supreme Court gives Trump a wave of victories in a blockbuster final week

The Supreme Court delivered several rulings that favored the Trump administration in its final week of the term. The decisions included limitations on universal injunctions, maintaining provisions of Obamacare, upholding a Texas law on age verification for adult websites, and allowing parental opt-outs from school classes with certain content.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to limit universal injunctions, which are court orders that apply across the entire country.
  • The court blocked the enforcement of an executive order on birthright citizenship for 30 days while further legal proceedings occur.
  • A ruling required schools to allow parents to remove their children from classes that conflict with their religious beliefs, such as those involving LGBTQ content or evolution.
  • The court upheld a key part of the Affordable Care Act, ensuring free preventive healthcare services for around 150 million people.
  • The decision on Obamacare was supported by a mix of conservative and liberal justices.
  • A Texas law requiring age verification for people accessing adult websites was supported in a 6-3 decision.
  • Critics of the Texas law argue it imposes unnecessary restrictions on adult access to content.

Source Information

Supreme Court calls for new arguments in case on Louisiana’s second majority Black congressional district

Supreme Court calls for new arguments in case on Louisiana’s second majority Black congressional district

The Supreme Court has delayed a decision on creating a second Black-majority congressional district in Louisiana and will hold new arguments in the fall. This case is important because it could affect how race is considered in drawing voting maps and how redistricting lawsuits are handled under the Voting Rights Act.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court postponed its decision on a congressional district case in Louisiana and ordered new arguments for the fall.
  • The case deals with creating a second congressional district with a Black majority.
  • Some conservative justices may want to make it more difficult to file redistricting lawsuits using the Voting Rights Act.
  • The decision could impact how race is considered in making voting districts.
  • Justice Clarence Thomas wanted to limit race-based decisions in redistricting immediately.
  • The Supreme Court has been involved in this case twice, and two maps were blocked by lower courts.
  • The current district for Democratic Rep. Cleo Fields is likely to remain the same for upcoming elections.
  • Louisiana has changed its election process to primary elections in spring and a final election in November.

Source Information

Environmental groups sue to block migrant detention center rising in Florida Everglades

Environmental groups sue to block migrant detention center rising in Florida Everglades

Environmental groups have filed a lawsuit to stop the construction of a migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades. They argue that federal law requires a detailed environmental review and public input before the project can proceed.

Key Facts:

  • A lawsuit was filed on Friday to block the building of a migrant detention center in the Florida Everglades.
  • The center is being built on an airstrip in the Big Cypress National Preserve.
  • Environmental groups claim the project needs a strict environmental review by law.
  • The lawsuit was filed in a federal court in Miami.
  • Governor Ron DeSantis called the center “Alligator Alcatraz.”
  • The state plans to use heavy-duty tents, trailers, and temporary buildings for the center.
  • The center is intended to process people who entered the U.S. without legal permission.
  • Several federal and state agencies are named in the lawsuit.

Source Information

Supreme Court upholds program providing internet access to rural Americans

Supreme Court upholds program providing internet access to rural Americans

The Supreme Court ruled to keep a program that helps provide internet and phone services to remote and underserved areas in the U.S. in place. The court decided 6-3 in favor of the program, stating that it does not violate the Constitution, despite challenges from conservative groups.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court voted 6-3 to support a program providing subsidized internet and phone services.
  • This program supports rural healthcare providers, schools, libraries, and low-income individuals.
  • The program is managed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).
  • The decision ensures that rural and underserved communities continue to have internet and telecommunications access.
  • Conservative groups argued that the FCC was collecting taxes, which only Congress can do.
  • The Universal Service Fund was created under the 1996 Communications Act to support telecom services in rural areas.
  • The FCC collects payments from telecom companies to support the fund, amounting to $8 billion.
  • Justices Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas disagreed with the majority decision.

Source Information

Read the full Supreme Court ruling allowing parents to pull their kids from lessons using LGBTQ+ storybooks

Read the full Supreme Court ruling allowing parents to pull their kids from lessons using LGBTQ+ storybooks

The Supreme Court ruled that Maryland parents who object for religious reasons can remove their children from public school lessons involving LGBTQ storybooks. This decision reversed earlier court decisions in favor of the Montgomery County school system. Though the ruling is not final, it suggests the parents will likely win the case.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court decision allows parents to opt their kids out of lessons involving LGBTQ storybooks if they have religious objections.
  • This ruling reversed previous decisions by lower courts that supported the school system.
  • The court strongly indicated that the parents' position will likely prevail in the end.
  • The storybooks, such as “Prince & Knight” and “Uncle Bobby’s Wedding,” were introduced in 2022 to reflect the school's diversity.
  • Recently, more books have been banned in public schools and libraries, influenced by certain groups advocating for parental input.
  • Initially, parents could opt out their children from these lessons, but the school board later changed this policy, leading to protests and a legal case.
  • The case involved three justices who reside in the county, though their children did not attend public schools there.

Source Information

Supreme Court postpones Louisiana redistricting case to next term

Supreme Court postpones Louisiana redistricting case to next term

The U.S. Supreme Court will discuss Louisiana's redistricting plan next term. The main concern is whether the state unfairly used race to draw a new congressional district. Previously, a similar issue in Alabama was ruled illegal by the court.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court will review Louisiana's congressional district map next term.
  • The issue is whether Louisiana created a Black-majority district unfairly based on race.
  • A group of "non-African American" voters claim the districting is racial gerrymandering.
  • Louisiana has six congressional seats and about one-third of its population is Black.
  • The state initially created only one majority-Black district after the 2020 Census.
  • Alabama was previously found guilty of diluting the Black vote in a similar situation.
  • Louisiana redrew its map to include a second majority-Black district after court losses.
  • The Republican legislature aimed to secure seats for key GOP lawmakers in the new map.

Source Information

WATCH LIVE: Trump holds news conference after Supreme Court rules for limiting nationwide injunctions

WATCH LIVE: Trump holds news conference after Supreme Court rules for limiting nationwide injunctions

The U.S. Supreme Court decided that judges cannot issue nationwide injunctions, but they did not clarify how this affects President Trump's rules on birthright citizenship. The court also plans to announce outcomes on several important cases related to Trump's policies.

Key Facts:

  • The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that individual judges do not have the power to issue nationwide injunctions.
  • The decision did not specify what happens to President Trump's birthright citizenship rules.
  • President Trump is expected to speak about this issue later today.
  • The Supreme Court will release decisions on several remaining cases before summer, including emergency appeals related to Trump's policies.
  • These emergencies include cases on birthright citizenship and a Texas law about online age verification.
  • Other cases involve the firing of nearly 1,400 Education Department workers and government job cuts related to DOGE.
  • Decisions on emergency cases are issued quickly and usually without detailed explanations from the justices.

Source Information

Supreme Court sides with Texas' age verification law for porn sites

Supreme Court sides with Texas' age verification law for porn sites

The U.S. Supreme Court decided that Texas can require age verification for users to access websites with sexually explicit content. This law aims to protect minors by ensuring people prove they are at least 18 before accessing such material. The decision was made with a 6-3 vote, despite concerns about its impact on adults' access to content.

Key Facts:

  • The Supreme Court upheld a Texas law requiring age verification for websites with explicit content.
  • The law requires proof of age, typically through a government-issued ID, for anyone trying to access these sites.
  • The law aims to prevent minors (under 18) from accessing explicit material online.
  • The court's decision followed a 6-3 vote along ideological lines.
  • Critics argue the law is vague and could limit adults' access to constitutionally protected content.
  • Opponents claim the law does not adequately protect users' privacy or data.
  • The law exempts search engines and social media platforms from these requirements.
  • The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals previously upheld the law, stating it served the rational purpose of protecting children.

Source Information