The Supreme Court decided President Trump cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, limiting his ability to pressure other countries using energy-related tariffs. The ruling affects various sectors differently, with some industries benefitting and others still facing existing tariffs under different laws. President Trump announced new tariff plans using other legal powers.
Key Facts
Supreme Court struck down the use of IEEPA for President Trump to impose tariffs.
President Trump previously used tariffs as a tool for economic and geopolitical influence.
The decision particularly benefits companies from South Korea and Japan regarding batteries, while solar industries still face other tariffs.
Oil and gas companies remain affected by steel tariffs under a different act, which increase domestic costs.
President Trump plans to impose new 10% tariffs on most countries, excluding certain critical goods.
A new bipartisan bill is being considered that could penalize countries buying Russian oil and gas.
The ruling aims to ensure market predictability for businesses and consumers in the U.S.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
President Trump plans to use Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to reimpose tariffs after a Supreme Court decision affected his previous tariffs. This section allows for temporary tariffs for emergencies, with specific limits on time and amount. Trump intends to apply a 10% tariff on all foreign goods using an executive order.
Key Facts
President Trump will use Section 122 to reimpose tariffs after the Supreme Court's decision.
Section 122 allows for temporary tariffs during short-term emergencies.
Trump plans a 10% tariff on all foreign goods.
The tariffs under Section 122 can last up to 150 days unless Congress extends them.
Section 122 limits the maximum temporary surcharge to 15%.
Other trade options include Section 301 for investigating unfair trade practices and Section 232 for national security threats.
Section 122 does not require investigations, allowing quick action by the president.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The US Supreme Court has removed many tariffs President Donald Trump put in place, creating uncertainty for UK businesses. President Trump plans to bring back some tariffs through different legal methods. Key sectors like UK steel and aluminium are not immediately affected, but future trade concerns remain.
Key Facts
The US Supreme Court struck down many tariffs imposed by President Trump under a specific law.
President Trump plans to introduce a new 10% global tariff and reintroduce struck-down tariffs using different legal methods.
The tariff changes do not affect certain sectors in the UK, such as steel and aluminium.
The British Chamber of Commerce stated that the ruling does not fully clarify the situation for UK businesses.
The UK government's focus is to reduce tariffs wherever possible, particularly on steel and aluminium.
There's uncertainty about refunding the over $130 billion collected in tariffs, with potential legal disputes.
UK industry leaders seek clear guidance on the implementation of the ruling and progress on resolving remaining tariffs.
President Trump expressed dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court decision but indicated plans to address it.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against President Donald Trump's global tariffs, stating he exceeded his authority. The ruling does not clarify how the government will refund the estimated $175 billion collected. The case goes back to the Court of International Trade to manage the refund process.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court decided that President Trump overstepped his power with global tariffs.
The decision doesn't explain how or when the government will refund the $175 billion collected.
The refund process will be managed by the Court of International Trade.
More than 1,000 importers have already filed lawsuits seeking refunds, and more are expected.
Small businesses might face challenges in getting refunds due to costs and complex procedures.
Trump plans to impose a new 10% global tariff for 150 days using a different law.
The tariffs could affect steel, aluminum, cars, copper, lumber, and kitchen cabinets.
President Trump is expected to visit China for trade discussions next month.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The U.S. Supreme Court stopped President Trump's ability to impose certain global tariffs, which could help businesses like Jenelle Peterson's toy company. Business owners are cautiously hopeful but worried about getting refunds on tariffs they already paid. President Trump may use other laws to continue imposing tariffs.
Key Facts
The U.S. Supreme Court blocked President Trump's power to impose certain global tariffs.
Business owner Jenelle Peterson might expand her toy imports due to the decision.
Businesses are worried about the process to get refunds for tariffs they've already paid.
President Trump plans to impose a 10% global tariff using a different law.
The decision affects tariffs imposed under a 1977 law called the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
Despite the ruling, the average effective tariff rate remains high at 9.1%.
Businesses and trade groups welcomed the decision but still have concerns about other potential tariffs.
The stock market's reaction to the news was small, with only moderate gains.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
Victor Schwartz, a wine importer in New York, was a lead plaintiff in a Supreme Court case that ruled against President Donald Trump's global tariffs. The court decided 6-3 that Trump did not have the authority to impose these broad import taxes, which affected many small businesses. This decision marked a significant legal defeat for one of Trump's key economic policies.
Key Facts
Victor Schwartz owns VOS Selections, a company that imports wines and spirits to the U.S.
He challenged President Trump's broad tariffs, arguing they were illegal and harmful to small businesses like his.
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that Trump overstepped his authority with these tariffs.
The decision was a setback for Trump's economic policy and affected the way import businesses are taxed.
The case was helped by arguments that the Constitution gives Congress, not the President, the power to impose taxes.
Chief Justice John Roberts and two other conservative justices appointed by Trump sided with the majority.
Learning Resources, an educational toy company, was also a lead plaintiff, arguing similar points about the tariffs.
The ruling left some tariffs in place but overturned others, based on different laws.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
This article lists the eight best forex brokers for traders in the USA as of 2026. It highlights each broker’s strengths, including trading costs, currency options, platforms, and customer support, and notes that all are regulated by U.S. authorities.
Key Facts
The top eight forex brokers for U.S. traders in 2026 are OANDA, FOREX.com, tastyfx, Interactive Brokers, Schwab, eToro, Trading.com, and Plus500.
All brokers except eToro are regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and National Futures Association (NFA); eToro is regulated by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) and FINRA.
OANDA is ranked the best overall broker, offering 68 currency pairs, low costs, and support for major trading platforms like MetaTrader 4 and TradingView.
OANDA provides access to cryptocurrency trading through Paxos and futures trading via Wedbush, covering various products like commodities and financial indices.
High-volume traders on OANDA can join the Elite Trader program for cash-back rebates that lower trading costs significantly.
FOREX.com is noted for its low spreads, tastyfx is beginner-friendly, Interactive Brokers offers low commissions, Schwab provides strong customer support, eToro specializes in social and copy trading, Trading.com has a wide selection of currency pairs, and Plus500 is good for futures trading.
OANDA’s spreads on major pairs like EUR/USD start at 0.4 pips, with commissions lower than some competitors due to direct bank pricing.
Traders can choose from multiple platforms on OANDA, including MetaTrader 4, its own OANDA Trade, and TradingView.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The Supreme Court decided to remove several international tariffs set by President Trump. Despite this, President Trump plans to maintain most of the tariffs using different approaches.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court removed many tariffs put in place by President Trump.
President Trump plans to keep most tariff policies despite the ruling.
The discussion about this situation included Natasha Sarin from Yale University.
Natasha Sarin is a professor of law and finance.
She is also the president of The Budget Lab at Yale.
The discussion focused on how these changes affect the economy and consumers.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
President Trump announced that he will sign an executive order to impose a 10% tariff on goods from all countries. This move follows a Supreme Court decision that blocked some existing tariffs. The new tariffs are allowed under the Trade Act of 1974, which lets the President set tariffs for a limited time.
Key Facts
President Trump plans to impose a 10% tariff on imports from all countries.
This action follows a Supreme Court decision that overturned previous tariffs.
The tariffs are being imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974.
The Trade Act of 1974 permits tariffs for up to 150 days.
The tariffs under this act can go up to 15%.
President Trump cited addressing trade deficits as a reason for the tariffs.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The Supreme Court recently overturned several of President Trump's tariffs. Rick Woldenberg, who owns a toy company in Chicago, was a plaintiff in the case. He shared his thoughts on the decision and its impact on his business.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court overturned many tariffs that were put in place by President Trump.
Rick Woldenberg is one of the business owners who challenged these tariffs.
Woldenberg owns a small toy manufacturing company called Learning Resources in Chicago.
The case was brought to the Supreme Court, where they decided to remove many of the tariffs.
Woldenberg discussed the court's decision and its effects on his business operations.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
A promotion from Kalshi offers new users a $10 bonus when they make $100 in trades on predictions about NBA games or Olympic hockey. This offer is available for participants across the United States who are at least 18 years old.
Key Facts
Kalshi is offering a $10 bonus to new users who trade $100 on the platform.
The promotion requires users to sign up, verify their identity, and make a minimum deposit of $1.
Once $100 in trades is reached, the bonus is added to the user's account.
The offer is available to residents in all 50 U.S. states who are at least 18 years old.
Users can make predictions on events like NBA games and the Olympic men's hockey match between Slovakia and the USA.
The Timberwolves vs. Mavericks and Lakers vs. Clippers are highlighted NBA games for predictions.
In basketball, statistical analysis favors certain teams, such as the Timberwolves having a higher rebound percentage compared to the Mavericks.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The Supreme Court overturned President Trump's global tariffs, ruling that he lacked the legal authority to impose them. This decision might lead to refunds of about $120 billion for companies that paid extra costs under these tariffs, but nothing is certain yet. Businesses and their leaders are hopeful for quick refunds and adjustments to tariff policies.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump did not have the legal authority to impose global tariffs.
Businesses may receive refunds totaling about $120 billion, according to estimates.
The ruling is seen as positive news for businesses, potentially lowering costs and encouraging investment.
Key business groups, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, applauded the decision.
Stocks rose slightly after the announcement due to improved cost outlooks for businesses.
Businesses like Costco have been involved in legal actions to pursue tariff refunds.
Company leaders are urging quick action on refunds and policy reset to avoid future issues.
There is caution among businesses about counting on refunds, given past experiences with the tariff administration.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump's tariffs, imposed using emergency powers, are illegal. This decision affects the administration's economic plans and reduces the effective tariff rate significantly. Future tariffs will need approval from Congress or other trade authorities.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against President Trump's use of emergency powers for tariffs.
The decision stops the President's ability to impose tariffs without Congress.
The effective tariff rate drops to 9.1% from approximately 17%.
Businesses may face a complex refund process for collected tariffs.
Over $175 billion in expected annual tariff collections could be eliminated.
The ruling affects numerous trade deals previously established with countries like China, the U.K., and Japan.
Future tariffs will require lengthy approval processes through Congress or other trade authorities.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump cannot use emergency powers to apply certain tariffs, impacting his trade strategy. The ruling reduces some tariffs, but overall tariff levels remain higher than before 2025. Importers may not see significant changes yet, and ongoing legal processes could lead to further trade adjustments.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled against using emergency powers for specific tariffs.
The decision affects some tariffs President Trump introduced last year.
Average tariff rates on imports to the U.S. have dropped due to the ruling.
Importers have adapted by switching suppliers and managing costs.
The U.S. collected $240 billion from tariffs last year.
President Trump is exploring alternative legal pathways to maintain tariffs.
Some planned tariffs on items like furniture have been postponed.
Countries like Thailand and Vietnam have benefited from trade shifts.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
President Trump's emergency tariffs have been mostly invalidated by a Supreme Court decision. This could financially benefit Cantor Fitzgerald, a company led by Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick’s sons, as they can seek tariff refunds.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's emergency tariffs.
The tariffs involved were enacted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Cantor Fitzgerald, led by Howard Lutnick’s sons, may benefit from tariff refunds.
Howard Lutnick previously served as CEO of Cantor Fitzgerald and is now Secretary of Commerce.
Cantor Fitzgerald has considered deals to profit from tariff refunds.
The company discussed trading for a portion of the duties companies have paid.
Cantor Fitzgerald stated they are not taking positions on litigation claims.
Democratic Senators have expressed concern over potential conflicts of interest.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The Supreme Court ruled that several tariffs put in place by President Donald Trump were illegal. This decision limits the President's power to impose tariffs without Congress. Businesses might get refunds for the tariffs they paid, but the process is uncertain.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against many of President Trump's tariffs.
The court's decision stated these tariffs were imposed without needed congressional approval.
The ruling involved the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which the administration used to set these tariffs.
There's a possibility that businesses could receive refunds for the tariffs they've already paid.
The court did not provide guidance on how refunds should be handled.
The decision affects trade deals and global business relations established by these tariffs.
Stock markets and precious metals showed a modest increase following the ruling.
President Trump may use other trade powers to replace the tariffs affected by this ruling.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The U.S. Supreme Court has invalidated President Trump's wide-ranging global tariffs, ruling that he was not authorized by law to impose them. This decision may lead to a refund of tariffs, benefiting small businesses and states that opposed the tariffs.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against the tariffs imposed by President Trump.
The court said the law did not allow the president to impose these tariffs.
The ruling could result in hundreds of billions of dollars in tariff refunds.
Small businesses and states challenged the tariffs and won the case.
The Trump administration claimed the tariffs were justified as a response to national emergencies.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
Several major restaurant chains, including KFC and Nando's, have decided to leave the Better Chicken Commitment, a plan that focused on improving chicken welfare by avoiding fast-growing chicken breeds. They joined a new industry-led plan called the Sustainable Chicken Forum, which aims to maintain chicken welfare while reducing environmental impact and meeting high demand.
Key Facts
KFC and Nando's, among others, have left the Better Chicken Commitment.
The Better Chicken Commitment aimed to improve chicken welfare by avoiding fast-growing breeds.
Animal welfare groups criticize fast-growing chickens due to health issues and a higher risk of premature death.
The restaurant chains joined the Sustainable Chicken Forum, which focuses on both animal welfare and environmental issues.
These businesses say slower-growing chicken breeds produce more greenhouse gases, affecting the environment.
Some retailers, like M&S and Waitrose, remain committed to the Better Chicken Commitment.
The move comes amid rising demand for chicken in the UK and industry concerns over costs.
The British Poultry Council welcomed the decision, citing concerns over production costs.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against President Trump's global tariffs, stating he did not have the power to impose them unilaterally. The decision affected Trump's trade strategy, which is key to his economic policies. President Trump disagreed with the ruling and said the court was influenced by "foreign interests."
Key Facts
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 against President Trump's tariffs, saying he did not have the authority to impose them without Congress.
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote that the Constitution gives Congress the power to impose taxes, including tariffs.
Justices Neil Gorsuch and Amy Coney Barrett, both nominated by Trump, joined the majority ruling against the tariffs.
President Trump criticized the ruling, suggesting the court was influenced by foreign interests.
The ruling challenges Trump's economic strategy focused on using tariffs to boost American manufacturing.
Justice Brett Kavanaugh, also nominated by Trump, dissented, arguing that the tariffs were lawful.
The decision could prolong economic and political debates about trade policies.
President Trump plans to address the ruling and defend his trade policies in a press conference.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
The Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump did not have the authority to impose new taxes on imports by declaring an economic emergency. This decision affects his tariff policies, which he had made a key part of his economic approach.
Key Facts
The Supreme Court decided President Trump could not declare an economic emergency to impose new tariffs.
Tariffs are taxes on goods imported from other countries.
President Trump used tariffs to try to bring jobs and factories back to the U.S.
He warned that removing tariffs might lead to economic problems in the U.S.
This ruling could increase uncertainty about trade leading up to the elections.
Tariffs were an important part of Trump's economic message to voters.
Read the Original
Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original
article.
